Early Western Civilization

Traces the development of western civilization in 20 year time periods from 1050 to the present, in Europe and the New World.


<< Home

January 09, 2007

is a western v islamic clash inevitable?

There is little doubt that both Western civilization - now led by the USA - and the Islamic revolutionaries want to rule the world, if not politically than culturally or economically, but it is by no means inevitable that the antagonism that currently exists will develop into an all-out bloody clash.

There are two outcomes for this scenario:

  • There will be an all-out bloody clash in which one is the victor - wiping the other out completely; or both wiping each other out and a third power, such as India or China, stepping in to rule the world; or

  • There won't be an all-out bloody clash - life will go on as it has since 2001 with the western world having two choices. Either adapt to repeated and endless attacks by fanatic Islamic revolutionaries, or face the facts - of Vietnam, Cyprus, Algeria, Ireland, etc - and give up by getting out of the Middle East and trusting that the Islamic revolutionaries don't have the power to take over the rest of the world.

Whichever outcome happens over the course of history, what is inevitable is that Islamic freedom fighters/terrorists are going to play an important part in shaping the future of the western world. Like the IRA in Ireland, they are never going to give up. Their cause will pass from generation to generation. Our future, then, is in their hands.

As stated previously, if America really wanted to avoid repeating history it might have followed the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament and turned the other cheek after 9/11. By following the Jewish Old Testament 'eye for an eye' dictum, America appears to have fallen into a trap from which the only escape may be to give the terrorists what they wanted in the first place.

Complete withdrawal from the Middle East, however, would mean that all that rhetoric about 'not giving in' was a complete and utter show of stupid peacockery that caused a terrible and unnecessary loss of human life.

Complete withdrawal may also mean sacrificing Israel.

Is the western world prepared to do that?

Labels: , , , ,

Copyright 2006-2014 Early Western Civilization



  • Civilization Timeline AD 1050-2009


  • LATER WESTERN CIVILIZATION

  • the denouement of the old royal families
  • Act Like a Roman!
  • what's the new basis of western civilization?
  • does westernized constitute western civilization?
  • is being white the major criterion of western civilization?


  • IN DECLINE?
  • what are the signs of western civilization crisis?...
  • is the west polluting other civilizations?
  • has western civilization changed too fast?
  • will western civilization repeat history?
  • can western civilization be saved?
  • will immigration end western democracy?
  • the enemy within
  • multiculturalism promotes anglo-saxon shame
  • the empire strikes back
  • PC Zealots and Dhimmis
  • is greening destroying western civilization?
  • a new era of aggressive expansion?
  • is a western v islamic clash inevitable?
  • is christian unity possible?


  • ISRAEL
  • the easternization of Isreal
  • west risks being crippled by Isreal?
  • the secularization of Israel
  • will the western nations sacrifice israel?
  • why is iraq so important to moslems and jews?
  • why was judaism demonized last century?
  • why is judaism less popular than christianity and islam?


  • USA
  • Will Obama end western civilization?
  • a nation built on white slavery
  • is america evolving a new civilization?


  • EUROPE
  • Europe Risks Starvation?
  • will the european union save western civilization ...
  • Breivik the white knight
  • Let's Thank Henry VIII and Elizabeth I
  • has the reformation achieved its purpose?
  • The Sarajevo Code
  • Irish sectarian conflict
  • The Irish Catholic vs. Protestant Divide
  • Why is Islam being demonized this century?
  • will islam or judaic-christianity prevail?