The Sarajevo Code
When Dakota read Anders Behring Breivik’s manifesto she wondered why he chose July 22 to make not only his last entry in the manifesto but also to go on a shooting rampage – which he considered a legitimate act of war against traitors. Four references to July 22 1860 gave her a clue (and it wasn't the Lincoln Log).
“Four times in his manifesto Breivik repeated an incident that took place on July 22 1860 in Sarajevo,” explains Dakota. “This was the dispatch of a lengthy report by Consul James Zohrab to his ambassador in Constantinople, Sir Henry Bulwer, re-analyzing the administration of the Bosnia and Herzegovina provinces in the Muslim Ottoman Empire to see whether the promised reforms had been made to improve conditions for the Christians under Muslim rule and he declared the matter a ‘dead letter’ – nothing had improved, the Christians were still serfs and subject to great oppression and cruelty by their Muslim masters.”
“Breivik was making two points: that Christians are treated poorly under Muslim rule; and that if Muslims cannot be trusted to keep a promise to a powerful ally like Great Britain in 1860 then they cannot be trusted under any circumstances,” says Dakota. “But two more points were revealed later in the manifesto.”
“The third point was that the European powers sold out their Christian brothers under Muslim rule time and time again – they were traitors,” says Dakota, “and the fourth point, the tipping point for Breivik, was that by disallowing the Serbians the right to self-determination over their sovereign territory in 1999, the European powers were repeating history by supporting the Muslims against their fellow Christians as they did in 1860.”
“Breivik obviously thought that Consul James Zohrab’s report of July 22 1860 from Sarajevo was important enough to repeat it four times,” says Dakota, “and because he had planned his operation so meticulously, it is obvious that July 22 2011 was the date chosen for the dispatch of his own manifesto.”
“Had Great Britain acted appropriately on receipt of the report sent by Consul James Zohrab on July 22 1860 from Sarajevo – liberating their fellow Christians from serfdom rather than pandering to the Muslims – Breivik believed that neither of the great wars of the 20th century would have occurred.”
“A young Breivik, witnessing the rise of Islamism within the western world, but most particularly the complicity of his government in the selling out of fellow Christians in Serbia in 1999, pandering to the Muslims over the Muhammad cartoons and awarding the Peace Prize to Arafat (an Islamic terrorist) saw all of this as the act of traitors.”
“His missive to the world on July 22 2011 from Oslo – followed by a chilling massacre of traitors on the same day – was, in his eyes, a fit and proper act of retribution for what should have happened in Sarajevo in 1860.”
“He wanted to wake up Norway and all of Europe to the dire fate that awaits them should Muslim immigration continue unabated and the balance of power shifts with the inclusion of Turkey into the EU,” says Dakota. “He was a warrior in the medieval sense of the word – a Justiciar Knight Commander of the Knights Templar of Europe.”
“The Knights Templar crusader movement has three objectives: to rid Europe of Islam, to destroy cultural Marxism (multiculturalism) and to act as a War Crimes Tribunal.”
“Breivik had evaded mandatory draft service when he was 18 because he left no loyalty to Norway’s political party, and was completely self-taught in the arts of warfare,” says Dakota. “He probably gained most of his strategies from playing World of Warcraft – but maintains that playing the game was merely a way in which he could ‘cover’ himself from people wanting to know why he spent so much time alone.”
“Those who think that Breivik is a solitary nutter – a spree killer – are deluding themselves,” says Dakota. “This man was a commander in an army every bit as effective as any other.”
“Four times in his manifesto Breivik repeated an incident that took place on July 22 1860 in Sarajevo,” explains Dakota. “This was the dispatch of a lengthy report by Consul James Zohrab to his ambassador in Constantinople, Sir Henry Bulwer, re-analyzing the administration of the Bosnia and Herzegovina provinces in the Muslim Ottoman Empire to see whether the promised reforms had been made to improve conditions for the Christians under Muslim rule and he declared the matter a ‘dead letter’ – nothing had improved, the Christians were still serfs and subject to great oppression and cruelty by their Muslim masters.”
“Breivik was making two points: that Christians are treated poorly under Muslim rule; and that if Muslims cannot be trusted to keep a promise to a powerful ally like Great Britain in 1860 then they cannot be trusted under any circumstances,” says Dakota. “But two more points were revealed later in the manifesto.”
“The third point was that the European powers sold out their Christian brothers under Muslim rule time and time again – they were traitors,” says Dakota, “and the fourth point, the tipping point for Breivik, was that by disallowing the Serbians the right to self-determination over their sovereign territory in 1999, the European powers were repeating history by supporting the Muslims against their fellow Christians as they did in 1860.”
“Breivik obviously thought that Consul James Zohrab’s report of July 22 1860 from Sarajevo was important enough to repeat it four times,” says Dakota, “and because he had planned his operation so meticulously, it is obvious that July 22 2011 was the date chosen for the dispatch of his own manifesto.”
“Had Great Britain acted appropriately on receipt of the report sent by Consul James Zohrab on July 22 1860 from Sarajevo – liberating their fellow Christians from serfdom rather than pandering to the Muslims – Breivik believed that neither of the great wars of the 20th century would have occurred.”
“A young Breivik, witnessing the rise of Islamism within the western world, but most particularly the complicity of his government in the selling out of fellow Christians in Serbia in 1999, pandering to the Muslims over the Muhammad cartoons and awarding the Peace Prize to Arafat (an Islamic terrorist) saw all of this as the act of traitors.”
“His missive to the world on July 22 2011 from Oslo – followed by a chilling massacre of traitors on the same day – was, in his eyes, a fit and proper act of retribution for what should have happened in Sarajevo in 1860.”
“He wanted to wake up Norway and all of Europe to the dire fate that awaits them should Muslim immigration continue unabated and the balance of power shifts with the inclusion of Turkey into the EU,” says Dakota. “He was a warrior in the medieval sense of the word – a Justiciar Knight Commander of the Knights Templar of Europe.”
“The Knights Templar crusader movement has three objectives: to rid Europe of Islam, to destroy cultural Marxism (multiculturalism) and to act as a War Crimes Tribunal.”
“Breivik had evaded mandatory draft service when he was 18 because he left no loyalty to Norway’s political party, and was completely self-taught in the arts of warfare,” says Dakota. “He probably gained most of his strategies from playing World of Warcraft – but maintains that playing the game was merely a way in which he could ‘cover’ himself from people wanting to know why he spent so much time alone.”
“Those who think that Breivik is a solitary nutter – a spree killer – are deluding themselves,” says Dakota. “This man was a commander in an army every bit as effective as any other.”
"Interestingly, July 22 1860 was also the date Lincoln writes to George C. Latham on his failure to gain admittance to Harvard - writing 'you can not fail, if you resolutely determine, that you will not. . . . ' and this may also have been relevant to Breivik had he read it," says Dakota, "but there is no evidence in the manifesto that he did."
<< Home