Breivik the white knight

Dakota downloaded the 1,518-page manifesto and personal details of the Norwegian spree murderer, Anders Behring Breivik, hoping to get a better understanding of the man, and surprisingly found that his ideas are in line with hers and probably millions of white people world wide – so there is obviously a point at which being too ‘proud’ of one’s race and culture leads to megalomaniacal and murderous thoughts which, in Breivik’s case, manifested in his becoming a White Knight on a crusade to save western civilization from the multiculturalists.

“There are many who agree with his belief that multiculturalism, Islam, cultural Marxism and political correctness are slowly killing western civilization – at least as we know it,” says Dakota, “but to appoint himself as some sort of ‘white knight’ on a crusade to kill those of his own kind who unashamedly defend multiculturalism and mass immigration is either an act of total insanity or megalomaniacal far-right cold-bloodedness - or both.”

“Breivik’s heroes were not megalomaniacal far-right cold-blooded leaders like Hitler or Mussolini, though,” says Dakota. “He admired leaders such as Putin, Churchill, Gandhi and Howard – and writers such as Orwell, Jefferson, Locke, Burke, Shaw and Twain.”

“He also named his manifesto (2083: The European Declaration of Independence) after the U.S. Declaration of Independence, so he held America’s founding fathers in high esteem, too – but then the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, was similarly motivated by great thinkers and leaders in his manifesto ravings,” says Dakota. “So, if Norway - or Europe - reacts to this heinous spree killing by cracking down on ‘Right’ views then it will need to remove a great deal of progressive literature as well as tons of blogs railing about the very situation that inspired Breivik to act out some sort of White Knight fantasy role.”

“Breivik was merely pointing out, I think, that in times of crisis a great leader appears to save the day – to prevent forces of evil, oppression or economic disaster from taking away a nation’s inalienable right to freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness or racial pride – and because he thought that Norway was in crisis, and no great leader had emerged, then it was his duty to become one.”

“Crazily, this guy has set back his very own cause by his heinous deeds,” says Dakota. “Rather than inspiring his ‘Right’ thinking compatriots to rise up against the multicultural ‘Left’ they are understandably gutted by what he has done and fear retribution.”

“The multicultural mass immigration ‘Left’ will be strengthened by this atrocious act and in defiance may go further to stamp out opposition from the ‘Right’ – allowing Sharia law and many more immigrants and mosques than ever before,” sighs Dakota. “If the ‘Left’ does take this course then the consequences for the ethnic Norwegians who are rightfully proud of their race and culture and unique homeland will be devastating.”

“But not as devastating, of course, as the 76 innocent lives wasted by Breivik.”

Read more by Dakota:

Was Breivik a secret Israeli operative?
The ethics of politicizing children
Breivik’s online fantasy world
Breivik’s social contract betrayal
Breivik’s July 22 Sarajevo Code
Stepfamily loners
Dating psychos like Breivik
Breivik, Christ’s Knight
be proud of your race!
immigration promotes white shame?

See also:

Breivik’s Aquarian Humanity?
Age Secrets of Anders Behring Breivik

Europe Risks Starvation?

Thanks to unbridled immigration, Jerri believes that most of Europe is now at risk of starvation and governments, socialist or not, will just sit back and let it happen -- like they did in 1847 when Ireland was hit by the potato famine -- because western civilization, based upon capitalism, cares only about profit.

“In terms of food security,” says Jerri, “the UK and Germany are now worse off than North Korea, Nepal, Kenya, Ethiopia and Colombia; Italy and the Netherlands are now worse off than Sri Lanka, Peru, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela; Belgium is now worse off than Hong Kong, Chile, Burma and Uzbekistan; and Switzerland is now worse off than Haiti, Guatemala, Rwanda, Jordan, Madagascar and Somalia.”

“Shifting a mass of starving people from non-sustainable nations (particularly China, India, Japan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Pakistan, Egypt, Vietnam, South Korea and the Philippines) to sustainable nations, particularly marginally sustainable nations in Europe, was a short term 20th century solution that, in the long term, has caused the host nations not only to sink as far as food security is concerned but also to sink in terms of political and social stability as well,” says Jerri. “Thousands of non-Europeans pouring into Europe are being kept wholly on social welfare, and because less people in their homelands creates more breeding space, the nations they originally came from become more unsustainable than ever.”

“It will be a totally inflammatory situation for interracial relations in Europe when the food wars break out.”

“Also, allowing 91 unsustainable nations to become nutritionally dependent upon 72 sustainable nations in a spirit of globalized dependency has long term problems, too. Only one of the top ten dependent nations, China, has instituted measures to become nutritionally self-sufficient by limiting its population. The other dependent countries continue to expand their populations beyond the capacity of their arable land, and will continue doing so as long as they receive cheap food from sustainable nations and have opportunities to emigrate.”

“Increase the price of food and cut off opportunities to emigrate,” says Jerri, “and these nations will be forced to help themselves rather than accept parasitic status, and you can see this happening already.”

“In feeding these increasingly populous dependent nations, the sustainable nations are being forced to increase the yield of their arable lands by using dangerous agricultural practices. Increasing use of pesticides and fertilizers are poisoning the environment, and how many crops can be produced in a year without severely affecting the earth itself, not to mention water supplies and air quality?”

“Contrary to popular opinion, agriculture is not an environmentally friendly industry, and cheap food from sustainable nations does not come without political strings attached,” says Jerri. “Who wasn’t appalled by the food for oil scandals?”

“Europe does not have the arable land capable of supporting its present population,” says Jerri. “Most of Europe’s food is imported, and should a crisis occur in any one of the nations providing the food, Europe risks massive starvation and the breakdown in civilization that goes with it.”

See also:

• emigrate to a food secure nation!
• Echoes of Ireland’s Starvation
• time to stock up on food?
• one child is enough
• go forth, multipy and starve
• globalization promotes starvation
• are we a plague on the earth?

The Irish Catholic vs. Protestant Divide

The Irish troubles go back hundreds of years, and whatever spin others want to apply to the ‘troubles’ the basic antagonism, according to Regan, is the catholic vs protestant divide.

“The partitioning of the Emerald Island into a protestant North and a catholic South was applying a band-aid, not a solution,” says Regan, “because there are just as many Catholics in the North as there are protestants in the South – but it is the raving Catholics in the North who refuse to live in peace.”

"A great many Northern Irish – peace loving Catholics and Protestants - left for England after 1969 when the British Army moved in,” says Regan, “and we left in 1992.”

“For 38 years until July 31 2007 the British Army’s occupation of Northern Ireland was its longest continuous military campaign in its history,” says Regan, “and I fail to see what it has done, other than delay the inevitable reunion of the Emerald Isle.”

"Apart from satisfying the blood lust of some raving Protestants who would rather die or cause innocent people to die than suffer under majority Catholic rule, the 38-year British army presence in Northern Ireland was a total waste of resources and money and lives."

"If we have 9/11 to thank for anything," says Regan, "it's bringing perspective and sense to the raving lunatics of both religions in Northern Ireland, and particularly the financial backers of the Catholics in the USA."

will immigration end western democracy?

When non-white immigrants and their descendants outnumber the white race in western countries - which they will do by 2200, if not long before - western civilization will necessarily be replaced with a New Order.

This New Order, of necessity, will be reminiscent of the brutal regimes from which the refugees originally escaped.

In effect, western nations will ultimately be forced to supplant democracy in favor of a more manageable way of controlling jobless, hungry, hopeless and uncontrollable immigrant populations.

Brutal dictators, similar to Saddam Hussein or Adolf Hitler, will necessarily rise to take control of western nations. It may seem ironic that America and its allies went to war to depose Saddam only to appoint someone like him to take charge in their own nations, but when civilizations evolve they do not necessarily evolve into progressive and happy societies.

They do what they need to do in order to survive, and if that means sacrificing half of an overpopulated country by introducing a deadly disease or a so-called natural disaster then so be it.

Throughout history, populations have been sacrificed for the so-called good of the nation - Coventry and Pearl Harbor are well known WWII sacrifices. In fact, some theorists insist that 9/11 was another sacrifice in that the American government knew it was coming, but failed to protect its citizens because it wanted to protect its information sources and also wanted an excuse for war.

Non-white immigrants will out-populate the white race because they do not practice birth control. They hold deeply ingrained views about large families being a protection against all ills. Somehow it escapes them that large families are the cause of all ills!

Overpopulation, resulting in constant war, abject poverty, disease, famine, unemployment and brutal regimes originally caused these people to leave their homelands in search of a new life, and when they unwittingly recreate the same conditions in the host western countries - which they will do - few people will have anywhere on planet Earth to escape to.

Not the white race, nor the non-white immigrants.

China forcibly instituted the one-child policy in order to save its civilization. If western civilization is to survive, it will need to institute similar drastic measures, but no politician elected by a multi-racial and multi-cultural voting population can possibly achieve this goal by transparent democratic means.

That's why a new autocratic regime will necessarily replace democracy when the homeland populations get out of control.

what's the new basis of western civilization?

Through immigration of non-white races, the concept of racial purity and superiority - the same concept that keeps other civilizations proud and strong - is being largely destroyed, along with Christianity, in all western nations.

In place of Christianity and racial purity, the new western nations espouse:

racial diversity;
cultural diversity;
religious diversity;
equal opportunity,
affirmative action;
political correctness,
globalization;
open immigration; and
extensive welfare and human rights programs.

These factors most definitely separate and divide western civilization from other civilizations - in that no other civilization would dream of implementing such crazy, liberal ideals - but what is the cohesive force that keeps western civilization together?

What is the essence, what is the unique feature of the new western civilization that distinguishes it from other civilizations and protects it from extinction?

Diversity? How can diversity be a cohesive force?

In the event of war with a civilization from which most immigrants came, what side would they be on?

is the west polluting other civilizations?

The new post-WWII ideals of western civilization, in both Europe and America, enshrine within and encourage throughout the rest of the world:

• racial, cultural and religious diversity;
• immigration rights;
• democratic government;
• welfare rights;
• freedom of speech;
• extended human rights; and
• globalization.

These ideals were designed to promote cohesion and world peace, but they are effectively creating a crisis both within and without.

Far from promoting democratic ideals, for instance, globalization of western values is antagonizing other cultures and providing fertile ground in which dictators and fanatics can flourish.

All that is good about western civilization is vastly outweighed by all that is really bad about it.

Pornography, violence, drugs, alcohol, religious hypocrisy, gross obesity and rampant commercializion and greed are seen by other nations as particularly polluting, and these elements are not exactly embraced by most westerners, either.

Within, there is a backlash against the breakdown of a civilization that developed in Europe as an ethnically cohesive population with strong Christian roots; and without, there is a backlash against what other cultures see as widespread pollution by the West of values that are anathema to theirs.

Both within and without there are also environmental concerns that the rampantly greedy, globalizing western nations are destroying the planet.

The post-WWII western civilization adopted racial, cultural and religious diversity as its mantra, but no civilization can survive with a population bitterly divided by racial, cultural and religious divisions, especially one that allows its immigrants to denigrate and eschew all that the host nation holds dear.

The backlash from within emanates from terrified ethnic Europeans being forced to assume inferiority rather than equality with the non-European immigrants that are colonizing their countries rather than integrating with them.

Also, the backlash from within is targeted at the new multi-cultural ideals which they believe are polluting their own culture as much as they are other cultures.

Modern western civilization is not just polluting other civilizations but it is also polluting itself.